Review of the Mackie HR 824
Guitar | Bass | Keyboard | Microphones | Mixers | Audio Interfaces | Monitors | Sequencers | Soft Synths | Live Sound | Drums | Club  | Accessories | Blowouts
 SameDay Music   shop at zzounds!


Guide | Rigs | Forums | Reviews | Bookstore | Jukebox | BlogsSearch  |  Mobile  

 

Review of the
Mackie HR 824

High Resolution Studio Monitor

 

by the Tweak

 

Pros

Great clear, powerful sound

Requires no amplification

Has many settings which can be tweaked to optimize the monitor for placement

Excellent Bass for a monitor this size

 
Cons

More expensive than other home studio monitors

 

Overview

 

When one decides to upgrade their studio monitors, you are immediately beset by a myriad of issues.  Should you get active or Passive monitors?  Near-fields or mid fields?  Subwoofer?  Yes or No?  Flat sound or Hi-Fi sound?  In your research you have undoubtedly heard of the Mackie HR series monitors.  Their active (powered) studio monitors enjoy not only a rather extensive advertising campaign but wide-spread popularity among professional studios. This is particularly so with the Mackie HR824s.  

 

Indeed there is so much talk about these monitors that one compelling argument to get them is simply that they are what they are--Mackie 824s.  In a way, the success of Mackie's marketing campaign is that they have created a standard, a benchmark, against which all active monitors can be compared.  While the 824's may be expensive relative to others in the home studio market, they are the inexpensive alternative among the hi-end mastering lab monitors such as the Genelecs and DynAudio.  Mackie did a great job positioning these perfectly between the pro and home studio camps where they would be attractive to both.

 

Like all monitors, the Mackies have a unique sound.  Nothing else sounds exactly like them, though many come close.  Naturally, when we talk about the sound of a monitor we are going to have to get subjective.  Here's how the Mackie's sound to me.  Your ears may vary.

 

large product image

The HR824mk2 has replaced the original now discontinued HR824. 

 

The overall sound

 

Compared to most speakers the 824s have a clarity to them that other lesser monitors cannot touch.  The upper range of frequencies shine through with no artifacts and with a clear sound you may be unaccustomed to. This becomes even more evident when one listens to the vocal range of frequencies.  Vocals are more than alive and well.  You can hear nuances you did not hear in the original recording.  And the vocal frequencies sound uncommonly smooth and pronounced---yep, vocals seem louder, than they are on "average speakers".  The bass, which is powerful thanks not only to the 8 inch woofer but to an internal passive radiator, can get very low. Not as low as a subwoofer can go, but deep enough where having a subwoofer may not be so important, or a distraction.  Comparing the bass response of the HR824s  to a subwoofer enhanced system is illuminating.  The lowest frequencies, say, 20-40hz range roll off rather quickly on the Mackies even at it's lowest settings. 

What this means is that the lowest of the lows are not going to be heard. As you bring in a subwoofer, bass takes on a dimension that is absent in the HR824 by itself. But the bass you do hear is solid and tight, strong, but not boomy, at least in my studio..  You will not be mistaking a low F for an F# as you might on lesser monitors with less bass.  But if you need "all" of the bass, then you probably should go for a sub enhanced system, or perhaps add the Mackie Subwoofer to the HR824s.  There is a 3-way bass roll off switch on the back which has points at 37hZ, 47hZ and 80hZ.  If you want to add a sub, naturally, you would choose the 80hZ. Another advantage of this switch is you can have the Mackie's emulate a smaller monitor.

Mackie HR824MKII 2-Way Active Studio Monitor (1x8 in.)
The high-resolution HR824mk2 Active studio reference monitor sounds as smooth as it looks. The new Zero Edge Baffle minimizes diffraction for a crystal clear image of your mix, and controls sound waves for wide, even dispersion.

 
Mackie HR624MKII 2-Way Active Studio Monitor (1x6 in.)
With the same design as the HR824mk2 in a smaller package, the HR624mk2 high-resolution Active studio reference monitor is the perfect alternative when space is limited. The new Zero Edge Baffle minimizes diffraction and controls sound waves for wide, even dispersion.

 
Mackie HRS120 Active Subwoofer (12 in.)  The Mackie HRS120 is a THX-approved, 12 in. active subwoofer that is ideal for applications where precise, low frequency reproduction and flexible monitoring and control options are required. The HRS120 is engineered to work in harmony with the HR824 and HR624.
 
 Mackie MR8 2-Way Active Studio Monitor (1x8 in.)
Mackie MR8 Studio Monitors deliver truly professional quality and everything you need for critical monitoring — at a price that’s unbelievably affordable. Wide, even dispersion means a broad sweet spot, minimizing funny dips or peaks in frequency response when you move off axis.

 

 

Are the Mackie's the Perfect Reference Monitor?

 

The true irony of any exceptional monitor is that the better it sounds, the less you tweak your mix.  Why?  Because what you hear coming out of the Mackies is excellent.  Is this a problem?  No and yes.  No, because you can hear imperfections in your tracks with great clarity.  You are unlikely to let by any damaged audio because it will be sticking out plain as day.  Yes, because great sound is deceptive.  Here's some areas where the Mackie's might actually deceive someone at mixdown.

 

Vocals

 

With such great clarity in the vocal range, it is easy to put a track to bed with little hi frequency enhancement.  You sense it does not need it.  However, when you reference on your less adorned monitors you might find the vocal dull and more buried.  After a day working my most recent mix and feeling I had it in the can, I burned a CD and took it to the living room to listen on my old bookshelf speakers.  Shock, it sounded awful.  So back in the lab I ramped up the hi freq EQ and killed the reverb.  This made the vocal sound "edgy" on the Mackies.  But it made the living room mix sound "right".  I then went around the back of the Mackie and set the high frequency contour to -2.  This seemed to help give the 824's a more "real world" transient response.  

 

Imaging

 

They are not kidding when they say the Mackies have a large sweet spot.  All you have to do is A/B them with other monitors in your studio and this will become obvious.  The image of the 824s is incredible.  It has a huge "center stage" that makes other monitors sound "narrow".  Again, there is some risk of deceiving yourself that you have a wide and spacious mix when in the real world, you don't.  I found I had to go through a spatial processor to get the living room mix as wide as I wanted it.

 

Bass

 

One thing about the 824's bass--it is quite powerful and clean.  I am happy to report that it actually helps me get the troublesome bass level set properly.  I also found that a moderate bass level on the Mackies translated to a strong bass on my other monitors.  If I were to mix up a strong bass on the Mackies my other speakers got boomy.  This is no doubt due to the fact that the Mackies can handle strong bass tones without breaking up.  While other monitors may pop their woofs and wheeze out their ports, the Mackies simply remain tight and solid. Once I got used to that and compensated by not tweaking in too much bass, I found that my mix sounded right on both subwoofer enhanced systems and on bass-shy speakers.  

I am finding this is superior to mixing with subwoofers.  Why?  When you mix with subs it's easy to have great bass definition that does not translate at all to bass shy speakers.  Lets take timpani for example.  Mixing with a subwoofer, its really easy to get a thundering tone, that blasts deep into your internal organs.  Yet on a small speaker system, it turns to a metallic-like cardboard box sound. Mixed on the HR824's you'd never hear that really low thunder tone like it is on the sub so you'd boost the lo freq of the timpani.  This adjustment makes it sound perfect on a bass shy monitor and awesome on a subwoofer.  This is just to say that the roll-off of low frequencies where they are can make for a better, more universal bass mix. (Mackie claims the HR824 is flat down to 39hZ where a typical subwoofer will be able to reach down to 30, 25 and even 20hZ).

There is a switch that effects bass response on the back that has settings for placing the 824's in corners and flush against the wall.  These settings attenuate the bass to compensate for the room's exaggeration of bass frequencies.  I did not need it, but it is nice to know it is there. 

 

The True Test

 

The true test of a reference monitor is: Does an excellent sounding mix translate to other systems?  The answer, as you should have guessed by now is, it depends.  It depends on your experience.  I have already learned that I need to notch up hi frequencies to get a vocal to sit up properly on my other systems. I've learned not to push the Mackies on bass.  I have learned not to trust the spacious, luxurious Mackie sound as the end point in the game.  This is not a deficiency but a rite of passage one has to go through with any monitor

 

Other issues

 

Power

 

You can read specs all day, but you won't have an idea of how powerful the monitors are till you hook them up to your gear.  I have mine connected to the control room outs of my Behringer MX9000 which outputs a +4 unbalanced line level signal. Set to full normal operation, the Mackie's were extremely loud at the center position of the control room pot.  I turned down the Mackie's input sensitivity to -10.  Now the level is moderately loud at 50% and I usually mix at 30% which is a comfortable level. The Mackie's sound good both loud and soft. One has a feeling that there are immense spare power resources under the hood. For those that want specs, the bass driver can produce 150 watts continuous (or 350 watts peak) and the hi frequency driver produces 100 watts continuous (or 210 watts peak).  That's plenty of juice for any home studio 

There are many ways to connect the Mackies.  Options on the HR 824 include XLR (mic cables), 1/4 phone (you can use both balanced or unbalanced cables on these jacks) and RCA for home stereos. tape decks, DJ gear, etc.

 

Are they Nearfields or MidFields?

 

I have my 824s positioned 4 feet away in the typical equilateral triangle.  I certainly would not want them any closer than that. I am confident they would work well 5 feet away and sound awesome.  Placing them further out, as is the case with all monitors, will bring in more "room sound".  If you consider 4 feet to be a nearfield then that's what you have.  My other near fields are stationed 3 feet away and my mid- fields are 5 1/2 feet away. 

 

Summing it all

 

The Mackie HR824 monitors are beautiful sounding monitors.  They sound great enough to be used in not only as mix-critical reference monitors but as living room audiophile speakers.  As one expects from Mackie products, they appear to be rugged and reliable and nicely designed.  You will definitely hear your mix with astonishing clarity in all frequency regions with no artificial hype coloring your hearing.  And you'll have a monitor that can outperform most other speaker systems an average person might have.  If there is any fault at all to the Mackie's it is that they sound too good and your ear may be deceived into thinking this goodness will translate to other, lesser systems.  But that is your job to figure out how things translate.  Their job is to present you with your sound in all its fullness.  They did their job well.

 

All the best,
Rich the TweakMeister

Want to comment on this article?  Go to the studio monitors and amplification forum

 

More Hardware Reviews by Tweak

 

Kaossilator Pro Review
Tenori-On
Presonus Central Station
Behringer ADA8000
BOSS RE-20 Space Echo
Stanton C324 Turntable
Stanton T90
Korg Electribe EA
Mackie HR-824 Monitors
Roland VG99, GK3, FC300
Emu Proteius 2000
Emu XL-1 Module
Emu Planet Earth
Roland JV1010
Roland SRX Expansion Boards
TC Helicon VoiceWorks
MPD16
Mackie 1402 VLZ
Behringer MX 9000
Roland SP808
DBX Digital Dynamics Processor
Emu E5000 Ultra Sampler
Yamaha DTX
Budget Studio Racks
Delta 1010
Emu 1820M
Kaoss Pad
Lucid 9624
Behringer V-Amp2

Studio Monitors Forum

 


TweakHeadz Lab | Studio-Central | Audio-Pro-Central  Master INDEX  | Store Affiliations | Site Map | Support the Lab | Privacy Policy | 2010 TweakHeadz.com