|
|
|
Compressors at zZounds See the Compressor Price List
Tweak: This is a tube compressor. It uses tubes to warm up the sound. Nice meters.
Tweak: Who needs 8 compressors? Those who want to mix off of an analog console, without going through a computer. Or those who want a compressor on each of their 8 busses that will catch the signal before it gets to the computer.
Empirical Labs EL8 Distressor Compressor
Avalon VT747SP Class A Tube Stereo Compressor/Equalizer |
||||||
You have no doubt heard people talking about compressors and recording. Perhaps you heard of albums or tracks being "compressed" to make the sound better. You may have also heard about audiophile albums boasting that "no compression" was used as a positive thing. Huh? What gives here? We'll get to that and many other issues in this article, designed to make you fully conversant about the compression process and where to use and how much to use and when not to use. We'll end up with a discussion of software vs. hardware compressors and when software is appropriate.
Compression, ideally, is an "invisible" sort of effect that can bring your audio material up to spec with professional recordings. Most audio professionals do use compressors in every piece and sometimes on nearly every track in every piece.
And sometimes compressors are overused. Ever listen to a radio broadcast talk show and notice that when no one is talking you hear noise and his coming through until someone talks? That's a compressor doing that. Radio stations, especially those with weak transmitters, pump the gain so they can get every ounce of volume out of FM radio's limited bandwidth. They know that the loudest channel will attract and keep more listeners than the ones at lower levels.
And the same is somewhat true of the music we buy and listen to. Top 40 music is always compressed, polished and buffed so when it comes across the radio or TV, even on tiny speakers, it's fully listenable and accessible.
There are 3 places in the audio chain where compression
can be used to enhance your work of art. We'll spend a little time on each
one.
Here the compressor is put on a direct out or insert of the mixer which takes the microphone signal after it is boosted by the preamp. Other methods are to place the compressor "in between" a mic preamp and an audio interface, or on the inserts of an audio interface or preamp.
| An important tip for those going mixerless: Before you buy an audio interface with built-in preamps consider if you will ever want to add a compressor. If you think you will, make sure the audio interface has inserts or sends. If it does not, there will be no way to add a compressor to the rig without buying yet another preamp. Those buying a mixer should take care that the mixer has direct outs or inserts, though you can get by using the alt 3-4 bus. To understand inserts, direct outs and alt 3-4 busses see the mixer class. |
The purpose here is to optimize the material
for the recorder. You want to make sure all low volume passages actually
do have a strong enough level where they won't bring in noise later, and you also
want to stop and loud "peaks" from overloading the recorder's input, which will
ruin the track. You can decide to avoid compression here, if you are good
at riding the gain or you have performers that understand how to position themselves
with the mic. (That is, they back off a few feet before letting out the loud,
and eat the mic when they whisper). There are many products specifically
designed for this task, and some may add tubes to impart a sense of warmth. If
you see a mic preamp on a single channel compressor, these are designed for this
part of the chain. Sometimes these are called vocal compressors.
But like any other gear, you can use it for other uses too, such as guitars, acoustic
instruments, etc.
Once you have your audio tracks recorded on your computer or multi-track, you will be in the process of tweaking each track to make it sound the best it can, in reference to all the other tracks. Here the compressor is added as an insert on a mixer. That is, the signal goes out of the fader, goes through the compressor, then goes back to the fader's channel. If you recorded your vocals and acoustic instruments without compression, you almost certainly have to use one here to get the track up to spec. This can be done in the computer with a plugin, in the multi track if it has onboard compressors, or you do at at the board. The idea is to get the tracks uniform, so you don't have instruments or vocals suddenly dropping out because they went soft on you. You also need to clamp down on those pesky peaks. If you have a single guitar note that peaks 15 db higher than the rest of the material, for example, your whole track will have to be mixed 15db down which will definitely put it in the background. The compressor, by clamping down on that peak, allows the guitar track to be boosted to near 0db, where it can, at least, be heard.
Compressors can also be used as effects in their own right on drum tracks. Drums are "peaky" by nature and by clamping down on the peaks, you can make the drums louder and fuller sounding. If you have ever heard any strong rock drums on the radio, you are hearing drums squashed down with compression and then boosted with volume. Drums without compression cannot hold up next to screaming vocals and distorted guitars. The same is true even for light jazz, where the engineer might only compress enough to tame the peaks, but not affect the transparency of the audio.
Compressor may be added here too, and can have
a dramatic affect, for better or worse. Some professionals advise against
using compression here. Particularly if you are sending the mix to a mastering
house for cd replication, let them use their gear. However, if this is a
home cd production, you will have to master it yourself. But again, more
cautions. See if your mastering software has any software tools for the
finalizing task. Mix to wave without compression and use a mastering processor
there. But if you are mixing down direct to a cd recorder or DAT and this
is the last stop, then go ahead, compress the mix. If done properly, the whole
thing will come out louder and stronger.
Dynamic Range at Mixdown
This is a good thing, right? Not if you want to be loud. Dynamic range is the difference between the softest passage and the loudest passage in a song. Compression shrinks dynamic range. it makes the soft part louder and the loud part the loudest it can be. So. Got to be Loud? It's at this point where you would consider multi-band compressors, like the TC electronics Finalizer and brick wall limiters, like the Waves L2. These will let you use every bit of space in the audio bandwidth and you will be able to maintain consistent loudness. Because those writing top 40 hits all seem to do this, you may need to go this route if that's your bag. Want to be soft and loud? You might consider not using compression or just extremely light limiting at all at this stage and preserve the dynamics of the material. Orchestral and ambient works benefit from this approach as it makes for great dramatic passages when the orchestra does get loud. This is where some producers boast, "no compression was used". Of course, they are not aiming to get played on the radio.
Just a new notes here. Most modern sequencers have software compressors these days. These come in many different styles and types and many of them sound quite good. However, these are mainly for post-recording. You apply them to an audio track or soft synth as a plugin, after the recording has been made. Software compressors do not help as you record, so they cannot limit the peaks coming off the microphone through the preamp and into the converter. Hardware compressors, on the other hand, when setup correctly, modify the signal before it is recorded, thus preventing the overloads that can ruin a take. If you don't want to use a hardware compressor here you simply have to be careful about overloads. With 24 bit recording you can record at a lower level to avoid overloads, however, it is a great idea to have the protection of a hardware compressor all the same.
The UAD-1 Fairchild 670 Software Compressor
There are some great software compressors available today. As usual, the better ones will cost you. Take a look at the Universal Audio UAD-1 Studio Pak which features software models of the classic 1176LN, LA-2A, Pultec EQP-1A, and Fairchild 670 hardware devices. Also check out the Waves Platinum compressors. But as always, use what you have first, get as much as you can out of them, and then consider upgrading. One of the more unique compressor bundles you can get today is the Focusrite Liquid Mix which is a combination of software and hardware DSP in a unified control surface. The package includes 20 different EQs and 40 classic compressors you can use right inside your sequencer, yet it uses a firewire connected DSP for the horsepower.
OK, you should be up to speed on what a compressor is and why, how and where they are used. I suggest continuing your reading with the article on "The Perfect Mix", and "The Art of Recording Vocals"
|
Questions and AnswersQ) Tweak! "Everyone" says hardware compressors are no longer needed! What's your take on this?
Top Ten Reasons to Use a Compressor
|
Understanding Compressors and Compression by Barry Rudolph
Tube vs. Non Tube Compressors (see Owel's great post)
Go to the Next Class
Go to the Previous Class
| Want to discuss compressors? Go to the dedicated forum at studio-central.com |
|
TweakHeadz Lab
Studio-Central
Audio-Pro-Central |