Guitar | Bass | Keyboard | Microphones | Mixers | Audio Interfaces | Monitors | Sequencers | Soft Synths | Live Sound | Drums | Club | Accessories | Blowouts
| ||||
|
Using a Mac Pro as your DAWunder construction
You should know a little about me by now. My first computer was a Tandy TRS80 which only made bleeps as audio. The Commodore 64 had a sound chip inside and actually did 8 bit music. Huge improvement! My next was an Atari ST 1040 STE that ran an application called Notator (which today is called Logic, by the way) that could do multi-channel MIDI (not audio!). After my Atari Mega ST2 died, I went PC with a Dell 486DX. It did 4 tracks of audio! and had color video. Various PCs followed for the next 8 years, each time I got more tracks, more effects, more CPU power. 5 years ago I went Mac. A Mac G5 took me into the realm of being totally mixerless. Finally, last month I put down the plastic for Mac Pro 2.66 8-core with the new Intel Nehalem processors. And I am here to tell you about it.
Some people think that a Mac pro is "overkill" for audio/midi applications. To some extent they are correct. If you are only recording 8-24 audio tracks in a song any of the lesser Macs will do the job, including my old G5. The rub comes in with audio plugins and software synthesizers, particularly plugins that can act as a soft synth "host within a host", like Kore 2 inside Logic 8. This combination is so CPU intensive I can make the new Mac pro blink and stutter. But this is probably because of the coding in Kore2, which on my system does not take advantage of the 8 cores. But with Logic, filled with 50 tracks, tons of plugins and effects, the CPU meter stays low in the 25%-35% range, even at the most demanding peak of the song.
When I was about to purchase my system, I became a benchmark freak overnight, comparing the specs of the different Mac Pro offerings. The difference between the 2.24 vs 2.66 vs the 2.92 vs the older 2.8 and 3.2 8 core Mac pros. Then there is the 4 core vs 8 core decision. After the sale I am confident I would have been happy with -any- of the choices. i chose the 2.66 8 core because i did not want to be limited in the future to 8 GB of RAM when the industry moves to higher memory applications. I am into this Mac Pro for the long haul. For me, this DAW is going to have to go at least 5 years, so I want to feel it is still a powerful machine on Year 5. My system:
Mac Pro 2.66 8 core 16 GB memory 3 TB storage 2 PCIe Nvidia Video cards Audio: Motu 828mk2 (soon to be replaced) MIDI: Unitor 8 Mk2 and AMT 8 (8x8 midi itnerfaces) UAD2 Solo PCIe card Monitors: Apple 30" Cinema, 23" Cinema, LG 25.5" Monitor, Samsung 24" Monitor Controller: Novation ReMOTE 37 SL, Mackie Control Sequencers: Logic 8 Pro, Cubase 5
ThreadsTweak's Mac Pro is Up! Upgrade Notes
Links
Cool QuoteLife is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving.
Other Articles on Sequencers by Tweak
|
|
TweakHeadz Lab | Studio-Central | Audio-Pro-Central | Master INDEX | Store Affiliations | Site Map | Support the Lab | Privacy Policy | ©2010 TweakHeadz.com |